Keywords
Diagnosis
Code
Disease
How to Cite
Abstract
Activity of determining the disease code and writing the diagnosis must be in accordance with the correct medical terminology and the classification rules that apply in Indonesia, namely ICD-10 in order to get the right and accurate code. This study aims to analyze the relationship between the accuracy of writing a diagnosis and the accuracy of the diagnosis code in obstetrics and gynecology cases at Rumah Sakit Tk. IV DKT Kediri. The method used in this research is analytic research with cross sectional approach. Based on Slovin's formula, the sample used was 100 medical record documents of inpatients. The sampling technique used is simple random sampling. The data collection technique used observation with a checklist instrument. Data on the accuracy of writing the diagnosis and the accuracy of the diagnosis code were analyzed univariately, while the relationship between the accuracy of writing the diagnosis and the accuracy of the diagnosis code was analyzed using SPSS with Chi-Square test. The results showed that the accuracy of writing the diagnosis was 56%, the accuracy of the diagnosis code was 43%, and there was a relationship between the accuracy of writing the diagnosis and the accuracy of the diagnostic code for obstetrics and gynecology cases at Rumah Sakit Tk. IV DKT Kediri (p < 0.025).
References
Kementerian Kesehatan RI, “Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan RI Nomor 312 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Profesi Perekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan.” 2020.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI, “Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 55 Tahun 2013 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Pekerjaan Perekam Medis.” 2013.
E. N. Rahmawati and T. D. Utami, “Hubungan Ketepatan Penulisan Terminologi Medis terhadap Keakuratan Kode pada Sistem Cardiovascular,” J. Manaj. Inf. Kesehat. Indones., vol. 8, no. Oktober, pp. 93–101, 2020.
S. Mariyati, “Kajian Penulisan Diagnosis Dokter Dalam Penentuan Kode Diagnosis Lembar Ringkasan Masuk Dan Keluar Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kabupaten Wonogiri,” J. Manaj. Inf. Kesehat. Indones., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 114–121, 2013, doi: 10.33560/.v1i1.63.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI, “Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan RI Nomor 76 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pedoman Indonesian Case Base Groups (INA-CBGs) Dalam Pelaksanaan Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional.” Jakarta, 2016.
D. M. Agustine and R. D. Pratiwi, “Hubungan Ketepatan Terminologi Medis dengan Keakuratan Kode Diagnosis Rawat Jalan oleh Petugas Kesehatan di Puskesmas Bambanglipuro Bantul,” J. Kesehat. Vokasional, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 113, 2017.
W. Maryati, “Hubungan Antara Ketepatan Penulisan Diagnosis dengan Keakuratan Kode Diagnosis Kasus Obstetri,” J. Ilm. Rekam Medis dan Inform. Kesehat., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2016.
N. A. Heywood, M. D.Gill, N. Charlwood, R. Brindle, and C. C. Kirwan, “Improving accuracy of clinical coding in surgery: collaboration is key,” J. Surg. Res., vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 490–495, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022480416300993.
X. Diao et al., “Automated ICD coding for primary diagnosis via clinically interpretable machine learning,” Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 153, p. 104543, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104543.
E. S. D. H. Suryandari, “Relationship Between Specificity and Precision in Writing the Main Diagnosis and Accuracy of Main Diagnosis Codes with Financing Claims in Cases of DM in Dr Radjiman Wediodiningrat Hospital, Lawang,” Mod. Heal. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, 2019.
S. Cohen, A. S. Jannot, L. Iserin, D. Bonnet, A. Burgun, and J. B. Escudié, “Accuracy of claim data in the identification and classification of adults with congenital heart diseases in electronic medical records,” Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis., vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2018.07.002.
WHO, International Statistical Clas- sification of Disease and Related Health Problem Tenth Revision, vol. 2. 2005.
S. Campbell and K. Giadresco, “Computer-assisted clinical coding: A narrative review of the literature on its benefits, limitations, implementation and impact on clinical coding professionals,” Heal. Inf. Manag. J., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1833358319851305.
C. Opitasari and A. Nurwahyuni, “The completeness and accuracy of clinical coding for diagnosis and medical procedure on the INA-CBGs claim amounts at a hospital in South Jakarta,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 14–18, 2018, doi: 10.22435/hsji.v9i1.464.
E. Scheurwegs, K. Luyckx, L. Luyten, B. Goethals, and W. Daelemans, “Assigning clinical codes with data-driven concept representation on Dutch clinical free text,” J. Biomed. Inform., vol. 69, no. 2017, pp. 118–127, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.04.007.
L. Indawati, “Identifikasi Unsur 5M Dalam Ketidaktepatan Pemberian Kode Penyakit dan Tindakan (Systematic Review),” Journal INOHIM, vol. 5, no. 2. Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta Barat, 2017.
I. P. Risyanti and S. A. Yudianti, “Pengaruh Ketepatan Kodefikasi Penyakit Terhadap Validasi Laporan Morbiditas Rawat Jalan di RS X,” J. Rekam Medis dan Inf. Kesehat., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2020.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Citra Alifa Puspaningtyas, Hartaty Sarma Sangkot, Prima Soultoni Akbar, Endang Sri Dewi, Avid Wijaya